All the crap that…wait, this isn’t even fit to print!

From the New York Times: apparently, we’re supposed to believe that violence depicted in this year’s Super Bowl ads reflect the toll of the Iraq war. Somehow, in what can only amount to rampant over-analyzation and blatant agenda-pushing, Stuart Elliott of the New York Times has deduced that all of this violence in the advertising is a result of the war.

How is this news? How is this fit to print?

How does it make any sense?

The truth is, it doesn’t. It makes about as much sense as a non-binding resolution to stop the troop surge…which makes Stuart Elliott (and the NYT editorial board, big surprise) as big liberal wackos as the Democrats in Congress.


Categories: Iraq war, Super Bowl

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s